Nginx Vs Apache - Which One Is The Best ?
Apache and NGINX are the two most popular and open source web servers used all over the world and controls over 60% of the market share. Although the functionalities of both of them are pretty same, they differ in terms of their architecture, performance, and security along with a few other key points.
However, choosing one of them as a web server is not always easy since both of them are exceptionally well with a great track record.
NGINX vs Apache
In this article, we will discuss a few key differences between Apache and NGINX to help you select either of them that suits your requirements.
Both Apache and NGINX serves static and dynamic content differently. Apache uses a traditional file-based method for serving static content like CSS, JS or image file. However NGINX offers lot of php-fpm to do the same.
NGINX if configured properly with PHP-FPM, can process dynamic content quite efficiently. Apache is also equally efficient in processing PHP pages when multi-processing event modules (mpm_event) is configured correctly with PHP-FPM.
Therefore in case of serving dynamic content, both Apache and NGINX are equally good.
The design architecture of Apache and NGINX are quite different and it affects the way they handle connections and traffic from clients. Apache is based on the process-driven architecture where it creates a new thread for each connection request. This lead to heavy resource usages during heavy traffic that can cause issues with Apache.
On the other hand, NGINX employs non-blocking event-driven architecture and can serve thousands of concurrent requests with a single thread. In NGINX, a single master process (per CPU) creates multiple worker processes and each worker process has only one thread. As a result, NGINX works very efficiently with limited resources. This is in contrast to Apache where it can handle only one connection with a single thread.
When comparing NGINX and Apache in terms of security, Both Apache and NGINX perform exceptionally well with a proven security track record. The mod_evasive and mod_security module of Apache provides an additional layer of security by mitigating DDoS/Brute force attacks and installing a web application firewall respectively.
The Apache Software Foundation follows a proactive policy while dealing with security issues and denial of service attacks against the Apache HTTP server. The foundation also publish security bulletin and encourage users to report any new security issues with Apache.
Both Apache and NGINX can be extended with modules but the way in which functionalities are incorporated using modules are different. There are about 60 modules supported by Apache officially those can be dynamically loaded or unloaded as per your requirements.
NGINX also supports the notion of the module but earlier it was not possible to load modules dynamically into it. The system admins used to compile modules to integrate it to the core. However, in the beginning of 2016 NGINX got the support for dynamic module loading. With dynamic modules, you can optionally load separate shared object files at runtime as modules – both third-party modules and some native NGINX modules.
5. Operating System
Apache supports all major Linux and Non-Linux operating system and works on them perfectly. NGINX also supports Linux and Unix-like operating system but its support to Windows is partial. The performance of NGINX in Widows is also not as robust as compared with Linux.
NGINX provides official support for its commercial version NGINX Plus. The commercial version includes few added features in the area of load-balancing, media streaming, and monitoring. For free edition, NGINX offers community support through mailing lists, IRC, and forums.
While Apache does not have any commercial version but all commercial support can be availed through third parties. Like NGINX, Apache also offers community support through mailing lists, IRC and forums.
In general, Both Apache and NGINX excel in their own areas and cannot be replaced by each other. They have their own strengths and weaknesses. In the end, all depends upon defining exact requirements while choosing either Apache or NGINX.
According to Google Trends, NGINX is gained a lot of popularity over Apache in the last 5 years and its market share will cross Apache in the next few years for sure.
Below table gives you a quick overview when comparing NGINX vs Apache web server.
|Area||NGINX||Apache||Which is Better?|
|Architecture||Non-Blocking Event Driven, requires less CPU and memory.||Process driven, create threads for every request, requires more CPU and memory.||NGINX|
|Serving Static Content||NGINX has a lot of options to optimize it||Apache uses simple file based approach||NGINX|
|Serving Dynamic PHP Content||NGINX uses php-fpm to process PHP pages||Apache can process PHP and we can use mpm_event with php-fpm too.||Both are equally good.|
|Resource Footprint||NGINX works great with multi-processor environment and uses memory efficiently.||Apache requires more memory and CPU in high work load.||NGINX|
|Security||NGINX configurations are useful to prevent DDoS attacks||Apache has mod_evasive and mod_security modules||Both are equally good.|
|Modules support||NGINX now supports dynamic loading of modules||Apache supports a lot of modules that can be dynamically loaded and unloaded||Both are equally good.|
|Operating System Support||NGINX is great for Unix/Linux systems. However, Windows support is limited.||Apache supports all Unix, Linux, Windows OS.||If Windows, Apache is better. For others, both are good.|
|Support||NGINX provides paid support. There is a lot of free community-driven support too.||Apache doesn’t have commercial support. However, community support is more than enough to help you.||For larger enterprise, NGINX is better as they can get official support. For everybody else, both of them have enough documentation and online resources to cover all your needs.|